The AI Words List: 120+ Phrases ChatGPT Overuses
The AI words list, ranked by how badly they give you away. 120+ words ChatGPT overuses, each tagged by tier, why it's slop, and a human swap.
TLToo Long; Didn't Read
- →A single word is almost never proof. Density is the tell — twelve inflated words in three paragraphs, all pulling the same way.
- →Tier 1 (28 words) — kill on sight. "Delve," "tapestry," "underscore." They rarely appear in unforced human writing.
- →Tier 2 (44 words) — suspicious in clusters. The promotional register: "robust," "seamless," "vibrant."
- →Tier 3 (19 words) — light signals. Ordinary words like "crucial" and "additionally" that only count when they cluster.
- →Phrases beat words. "In today's fast-paced world" and "It's not X, it's Y" give you away harder than any single adjective.
Most "AI words list" posts hand you 50 words with no reason attached, so you end up scared of the word "essential" and blind to the sentence structure that actually outs you. This list is built from the same dictionary our detector runs on. Every entry gets three things: a tier (how strong a signal it is), why it reads as slop, and a human swap you can drop in today.
One rule before you scroll. A single word is almost never proof of anything. "Delve" in one sentence means nothing; twelve inflated words in three paragraphs, all pulling the same way, is the tell. That is why this is a tiered list and not a blacklist. Tier 1 words raise an eyebrow on their own. Tier 3 words only matter when they cluster. Read it as a density map, not a ban sheet. Vocabulary is only one of the 12 measurable signs of AI writing; this page is the deep dive on the words.
Want to know whether your own draft trips these signals? You can paste it into the free checker and watch the flagged words and phrases light up. It runs entirely in your browser, so nothing you paste leaves your machine.
1Why ChatGPT Overuses These Specific Words
This is not folklore. It is measured.
In 2024, a team led by Dmitry Kobak analyzed 14.2 million PubMed abstracts from 2010 onward. Certain "excess" words spiked so hard after ChatGPT's release that the authors estimate at least 13.5% of 2024 abstracts were processed with an LLM, reaching 40% in some subcorpora (Kobak et al., 2024). The most lopsided jump belonged to delves, which appeared at roughly 25 times its expected rate. Showcasing and underscores followed at about 9x each.
Zoom in on one word in a different database and the curve is just as steep. In the Dimensions corpus, delve went from 0.46% of abstracts in 2022 to 4.3% in 2024, a near-9x rise (Kobak et al., 2024). This is not a medicine problem. Across 25 leading economics journals, the frequency gap between LLM-flavored terms and normal economics language more than doubled in one year, from 2.85 points in 2023 to 6.67 points in 2024 (Feyzollahi & Rafizadeh, Economics Letters, 2025).
So why these words? The leading explanation is the training itself. Florida State University researchers identified 21 "focal words" that spiked with no natural cause, then reproduced the effect in the lab: models fine-tuned on human preference data grew fonder of these words than the base models did. As co-author Tom Juzek put it, "the enhanced model was less surprised by abstracts containing the buzzwords than the base model that had not been trained on human preference data" (FSU News, 2025). In plain terms, the people who rated model outputs during training appear to have quietly rewarded this register, and the model learned to write like an over-eager grant application. One honest caveat: the same team found delve behaves oddly compared with the other 20 words, so human feedback is a source, not the whole story.
That is the mechanism. Below is the vocabulary it produces. None of these words is banned, and plenty are useful in the right sentence. They are overrepresented, and when they pile up, a reader (or a detector) starts to smell the machine.
The tell is never one word. It is a room full of words all wearing the same suit.
2Tier 1: Kill on Sight (28 words)
These almost never show up in unforced human writing. When you see one, look for the others; they travel in packs. Each is flagged at full weight in our engine.
| Word | Why it's slop | Human swap |
|---|---|---|
| delve | The single most famous AI tell; humans say "look at" or "get into." | dig into, look at, get into |
| delving | Same word, gerund form, no less flagged. | digging into, exploring |
| utilize | Corporate padding for a three-letter word. | use |
| leverage | Consultant-speak; you almost always mean "use." | use, tap, apply |
| facilitate | Means "help" wearing a lab coat. | help, ease, run |
| elucidate | Nobody explaining something to a friend says this. | explain, clarify, show |
| embark | You start a project; you do not "embark on a journey." | start, begin |
| endeavor | A five-syllable "try." | try, effort, aim |
| encompass | Inflated "include" or "cover." | include, cover, span |
| multifaceted | Vague praise that says nothing specific. | complex, has many sides |
| tapestry | The metaphor that launched a thousand slop posts. | mix, blend, range |
| testament | "A testament to X" is pure filler scaffolding. | shows, proves |
| paradigm | Buzzword for "model" or "way of doing things." | model, approach, pattern |
| synergy | The word that gets people fired in real meetings. | teamwork, fit, combined effect |
| holistic | Wellness-brochure adjective. | whole, complete, all-around |
| catalyze | Chemistry cosplay for "trigger." | trigger, spark, kick off |
| juxtapose | Real people say "put next to" or "compare." | contrast, put side by side |
| realm | "In the realm of" = "in." | field, area, world of |
| myriad | Fancy "many"; often misused grammatically too. | many, countless, lots of |
| plethora | An "abundance" of pretension. | plenty, a lot, too many |
| underscore | The verb that spiked over 9x in AI abstracts. | highlight, stress, show |
| galvanize | Motivational-poster verb. | spur, rally, drive |
| epitomize | "Is the epitome of" padding. | sums up, is a perfect example of |
| unravel | Overused for "explain" or "figure out." | untangle, work out, explain |
| supercharge | Marketing-deck verb for "improve a lot." | boost, speed up |
| spearhead | You "led" it. Just say you led it. | lead, head, run |
| catapult | "Catapult your business." Nobody talks like this. | launch, push, boost |
| conceptualize | A whole word for "imagine" or "plan." | imagine, plan, design |
3Tier 2: Suspicious in Clusters (44 words)
Any one of these is fine. Three or four in a paragraph, especially the adjectives, is the sound of a model reaching for shine it hasn't earned. This is where most AI buzzwords live: the promotional register Wikipedia's editors formally flag as a sign of machine writing, right down to "boasts a" and "vibrant" (Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing).
| Word | Why it's slop | Human swap |
|---|---|---|
| robust | The default AI adjective for "good and sturdy." | strong, reliable, solid |
| comprehensive | Signals "I covered everything" without proof. | complete, thorough, full |
| seamless | Nothing is ever actually seamless. | smooth, easy, no-hassle |
| cutting-edge | Ad copy for "new." | new, modern, latest |
| innovative | Claims novelty instead of showing it. | new, fresh, original |
| streamline | Process-deck verb for "simplify." | simplify, tighten, speed up |
| empower | Feel-good filler; say what actually changes. | enable, let, give control to |
| foster | "Foster a culture of" is instant slop scaffolding. | build, encourage, grow |
| enhance | Vague "make better." | improve, boost, sharpen |
| elevate | "Elevate your X" is a marketing reflex. | lift, raise, improve |
| optimize | Often means "make a bit better," dressed up. | improve, tune, fix |
| scalable | Startup-pitch adjective leaking into prose. | can grow, expandable |
| pivotal | Inflated "key" or "important." | key, crucial, central |
| intricate | AI's favorite word for "complicated." | complex, detailed, fiddly |
| profound | Big claim, no evidence attached. | deep, major, real |
| resonate | "Resonates with audiences" is hollow. | connects, lands, sticks |
| harness | "Harness the power of" is a slop opener. | use, tap, apply |
| navigate | "Navigate the complexities of" is pure filler. | handle, deal with, work through |
| cultivate | "Cultivate a mindset" is grow-your-brand register. | build, grow, develop |
| bolster | Padded "support" or "strengthen." | support, back up, strengthen |
| cornerstone | "The cornerstone of" scaffolding. | basis, foundation, key part |
| game-changer | Hype that promises a revolution it can't deliver. | big shift, major improvement |
| groundbreaking | Claims first-ever status cheaply. | new, first, original |
| transformative | The adjective every product deck overuses. | major, sweeping, big |
| unprecedented | Almost always has precedent. | rare, first-of-its-kind, new |
| compelling | "A compelling case" tells instead of shows. | convincing, strong, hard to ignore |
| ever-evolving | "The ever-evolving landscape of" = doom. | changing, shifting |
| meticulous | Spiked hard in AI text; rarely earned. | careful, precise, detailed |
| versatile | Vague flexibility claim. | flexible, adaptable, all-purpose |
| bespoke | Boutique word for "custom." | custom, made-to-order |
| unwavering | "Unwavering commitment" is resume filler. | steady, firm, constant |
| vibrant | Travel-brochure adjective (see Wikipedia's list). | lively, bright, busy |
| unleash | "Unleash the potential of" is a slop staple. | release, let loose, free up |
| unlock | "Unlock your potential" is motivational filler. | open up, reach, access |
| unveil | Product-launch verb overused for "show." | show, reveal, introduce |
| craft | "Crafted with care" is artisan cosplay. | make, build, write |
| hone | "Hone your skills" is coaching-speak. | sharpen, improve, refine |
| tailor | "Tailored to your needs" boilerplate. | fit, adjust, customize |
| captivate | "Captivating content" tells you to be impressed. | grab, hold, hook |
| revolutionize | Promises to overturn an industry. Rarely does. | change, remake, upend |
| amplify | "Amplify your reach" marketing verb. | boost, increase, spread |
| illuminate | "Illuminate insights": a lamp metaphor for "explain." | clarify, explain, show |
| discern | Overwrought "tell" or "spot." | tell apart, spot, notice |
| innovative solutions | The buzzword-on-buzzword combo; near-meaningless. | (name the actual solution) |
4Tier 3: Light Signals (19 words)
These are ordinary words. You use them, I use them. They only count when they show up too often and too close together, especially the transition words, which AI sprinkles like seasoning. Do not purge these from your writing. Just notice when a paragraph has four of them.
| Word | Why it's a signal | Human swap |
|---|---|---|
| crucial | Fine occasionally; AI reaches for it constantly. | key, important, central |
| essential | Overused intensifier. | needed, core, basic |
| vital | Same job as "essential," same overuse. | key, necessary |
| significant | Often means "some" dressed up. | large, real, notable |
| remarkable | Tells the reader to be impressed. | striking, unusual |
| exceptional | Unearned praise. | excellent, standout |
| furthermore | Stiff connector AI loves. | also, and, plus |
| moreover | Rarely how people actually talk. | also, on top of that |
| additionally | The transition AI overuses most at sentence starts. | also, and, besides |
| consequently | Formal "so." | so, as a result |
| nevertheless | Textbook connector. | still, even so |
| ultimately | Filler wind-up before a conclusion. | in the end, finally |
| arguably | Hedge that dodges commitment. | maybe, possibly (or just commit) |
| indeed | Emphasis padding. | (usually just cut it) |
| notably | Signposting filler. | especially, in particular |
| paramount | "Of paramount importance": inflated "top." | top, most important |
| pragmatic | Sounds thoughtful, says little. | practical, realistic |
| foundational | Padded "basic." | basic, core, underlying |
| strategic | Corporate garnish on any noun. | planned, deliberate, targeted |
5The Cliché Phrases: Where AI Really Gives Itself Away
Single words are the easy part. The stronger tells are phrases: fixed strings a model reaches for because they were rewarded a million times in training. They are worse than any single word because they drag a whole rhythm along with them. If you write for a living, memorize this section.
- • "In today's fast-paced world" — the single most parodied AI opener. If your intro needs it, your intro has no idea what it's about yet.
- • "In today's digital age" / "In a world where" — same reflex, same problem.
- • "Let's dive into" / "Let's explore" — you don't need to announce that you're about to write.
- • "When it comes to" — 90% of the time you can start the sentence one word later and lose nothing.
- • "Picture this" / "Ever wondered" — manufactured hooks that promise a payoff they never deliver.
- • "Studies have shown" / "Research suggests" / "Experts agree" — with no citation attached, this is the exact move a real detector treats as a red flag. If a study shows it, name the study. This post links Kobak et al. and Juzek. That is the difference.
- • "The data speaks for itself" — then let it; don't announce it.
- • "The key is to find balance" — the answer to any question, which makes it the answer to none.
- • "It's not about the destination, it's about the journey," and its infinite cousins.
- • "At the end of the day" — a phrase that adds exactly zero information.
- • The most-searched ChatGPT phrase of them all. "It's not just a tool, it's a revolution" is what linguists call negative parallelism, and Wikipedia's editors list it as a formal sign of AI writing.
- • "The result?" / "The answer?" / "And the best part?" — the fake-suspense one-word question, then a line break.
- • "Here's the thing" / "Here's the deal" — false intimacy, faking a human aside.
- • "Great question!" / "Absolutely! Let me..." — means you pasted a chatbot reply straight through.
Two more families to watch
Wikipedia-rehash phrases (the sound of a definition being padded): "is defined as," "refers to the process of," "plays an important role in," "can be broadly categorized into." These turn a real explanation into an encyclopedia impression.
Business-speak that survived into 2026: "move the needle," "low-hanging fruit," "best practices," "take it to the next level," "the possibilities are endless." AI didn't invent any of these, but it reaches for them at a rate no human email ever did.
6AI Buzzwords: The Adjective-Plus-Noun Glue
One more layer earns its own callout, because it's what people mean when they search "ai buzzwords." The strongest slop signal often isn't a lone word. It's a collocation: two words that clip together and mean almost nothing. Our detector scores these as phrases, not as their component words, precisely because the glue is the tell.
- • robust framework
- • multifaceted approach
- • seamless integration
- • ever-evolving landscape
- • digital landscape
- • holistic approach
- • paradigm shift
- • meaningful results
- • continuous improvement
- • key driver
If your paragraph has a "robust framework" driving "meaningful results" across a "digital landscape," you have written a horoscope for a SaaS company. Each word is defensible on its own. Clipped together, they say nothing — which is exactly why a detector scores the pair, not the parts.
7The Transition-Word Habit
The last pattern is structural rather than lexical. AI doesn't just overuse transition words; it uses them to start paragraphs, over and over: However. Furthermore. Additionally. Moreover. Consequently. Wikipedia flags "Additionally" as a signature paragraph-opener in earlier model output. One or two is fine. When four of five paragraphs open with a formal connective, the writing has a metronome where its argument should be. The fix is boring and effective: start some paragraphs with the actual subject.
8How to Use This List Without Becoming Paranoid
A blacklist is the wrong takeaway. If you delete every word above from your vocabulary, you'll write stiff, hollow prose, which is its own kind of slop. Here's the sane workflow:
Don't self-censor mid-draft. Get the ideas down, then look for clusters.
One "crucial" is nothing. Six inflated words in two paragraphs is a rewrite.
"In today's fast-paced world" and "It's not X, it's Y" do more damage than any single adjective.
Every human swap in the tables above trades altitude for specificity. That trade is almost always right.
The fastest way to see your own clusters is to let something count them for you. Our free, in-browser slop checker highlights every flagged word and phrase in your text and tells you why each one fired (Tier 1, Tier 2, cliché phrase, transition tic), so you fix the density instead of guessing. Nothing you paste is uploaded; the whole engine runs locally. And if you want the categories these signals fall into, the named families of AI slop from Fake Authority to Pseudo-Insight, read our Slop Taxonomy. That taxonomy is the framework this word list is built on.
Two companion reads while you're here. If you're worried your own writing has drifted into this register, How to Write Content That's NOT Slop is the practical fix. And for the full field guide to spotting AI across images and video too, start with How to Spot AI Slop.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the most common AI words?
The single loudest signals are delve, tapestry, underscore, intricate, meticulous, and showcase. In a 14.2-million-abstract analysis, delves appeared at roughly 25 times its expected rate after ChatGPT's release (Kobak et al., 2024). But the phrase-level tells are stronger than any single word: "In today's fast-paced world," "It's not X, it's Y," and "studies have shown" with no citation.
Does using these words mean my writing is AI?
No. Every word on this list appears in genuine human writing. What matters is density: how many pile up, how close together, and whether they cluster with phrase-level tells. A tiered list exists precisely because no single word is proof.
Why does ChatGPT overuse words like "delve"?
The leading explanation is the human-feedback stage of training. Florida State University researchers reproduced the effect in the lab and found that models fine-tuned on human preference data grew fonder of these words than base models did (FSU News, 2025). It's a signal, not a settled explanation: the same team found delve behaves differently from the other overrepresented words.
Can I just find-and-replace these words to sound human?
It helps, but it's not enough. Swapping "utilize" for "use" is a real improvement. Swapping "delve" for "dig into" everywhere while keeping the same hollow, evidence-free, transition-heavy structure just produces well-disguised slop. The fix is specificity and evidence, not a thesaurus.
Is this list about detecting AI or judging quality?
Judging quality. We don't claim these words prove a machine wrote something, because models change and humans write clichés too. We flag them because they correlate with low-substance, generic prose, which is the thing actually worth catching. That's the difference between an origin detector and a quality checker.
Sources & Further Reading
- → Kobak et al., "Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary" (arXiv, 2024)
The flagship large-scale study. 14.2M PubMed abstracts, the "at least 13.5% of 2024 abstracts" estimate (up to 40% in some subcorpora), and the excess-word frequency ratios (delves ~25x, showcasing / underscores ~9x).
- → Juzek & Ward, "Why Does ChatGPT 'Delve' So Much?" (arXiv, 2024)
Identifies 21 "focal words" and tests the reinforcement-learning-from-human-feedback explanation for why models overuse them.
- → Florida State University News: "Why Does ChatGPT 'Delve' So Much?" (2025)
Plain-language write-up of the FSU study, with the co-authors' quotes on human-preference training.
- → Feyzollahi & Rafizadeh, "The adoption of Large Language Models in economics research" (Economics Letters, 2025)
Across 25 economics journals, the LLM-term frequency gap more than doubled (2.85pp to 6.67pp) from 2023 to 2024.
- → Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing
The community-maintained catalog of puffery words, "not just X, but Y" negative parallelism, and transition-word overuse that editors use to flag machine-written prose.
- → SlopDetector, the free local slop checker
Paste your own text to see which of these words and phrases fire, and why, with nothing uploaded.
- → Slop Taxonomy
The named categories of AI slop that this word list plugs into.
See Which of These Words Your Draft Trips
Paste your text and watch every flagged word and phrase light up, by tier — nothing uploaded, all in your browser.
Try the Slop Detector